AMD Radeon RX 7600 GPU Specifications Reveal Higher Power Consumption Than The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Series

The final specifications of AMD's upcoming Radeon RX 7600 8 GB GPU have been revealed & it has a higher power rating than NVIDIA's RTX 4060 series.

AMD Radeon RX 7600 8 GB GPU Consumes More Power Than An RTX 4060 Ti While Being A RTX 4060 Competitor

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 8 GB is considered to be a mainstream graphics card based on an entry-level RDNA 3 GPU. This RDNA 3 GPU is known as the Navi 33 and is the smallest and the only chip in the family that utilizes a 6nm monolithic design. Although we have known the core configuration of the chip for months now, Videocardz managed to obtain the official specifications from the RG ( Reviewers Guide).

Starting with the details, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 graphics card will feature the Navi 33 XL GPU which incorporates 13.3 Billion transistors in a 204mm2 die. This chip is 14% smaller than Navi 23 GPUs featured on the Radeon RX 6600 series. The chip offers a total of 16 WGPs, 32 compute units, 32 ray-tracing units, 64 AI accelerators, and a total of 2048 stream processors. The clock speed has been configured at 2250 MHz "Game" and 2625 MHz "Boost" which delivers a maximum compute performance of 21.75 TFLOPs (FP32) and 43.5 TFLOPs (FP16).

  • AMD Navi 33: 2048 Cores, 128-bit Bus, 32 MB Infinity Cache, 204mm2 GPU Die @6nm
  • AMD Navi 23: 2048 Cores, 128-bit Bus, 32 MB Infinity Cache, 237mm2 GPU Die @7nm
Image Credits: Videocardz

As for the memory, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 graphics card will feature 8 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 18 Gbps speeds across a 128-bit interface. The GPU also comes packed with 32 MB of Infinity Cache and both combined delivered an effective bandwidth of 476.9 GB/s (288 GB/s from the GDDR6). The GPU also packs 64 ROPs.

The Navi 33 GPUs feature a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface due to their entry-level chip design. Power will be provided through a single 8-pin connector for up to 165W TBP. Now based on the power figures, it looks like NVIDIA will retain the efficiency lead since the GeForce RTX 4060 8 GB which is the direct competitor to the RX 7600, will feature a TGP of 115W with actual average gaming performance as close to 100W. Even the RTX 4060 Ti which is faster than the RX 7600, as seen in benchmark leaks, consumes lower power of 160W with average gaming power rated at just 140W.

Image Credits: Videocardz

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 8 GB graphics card will be available in both reference & custom models when it launches this week for a price of around $299 US.

AMD Radeon RX 7000 RDNA 3 GPU Lineup "Rumored":

Graphics Card AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT AMD Radeon RX 7600
GPU Navi 31 XTX Navi 31 XT Navi 31 ? Navi 32 ? Navi 32 ? Navi 33 XL
Process Node 5nm+6nm 5nm+6nm 5nm+6nm 5nm+6nm 5nm+6nm 6nm
Die Size 300mm2 (Only GCD)
522mm2 (with MCDs)
300mm2 (Only GCD)
522mm2 (with MCDs)
300mm2 (Only GCD)
522mm2 (with MCDs)
TBD TBD 204mm2
Transistors 58 Billion 58 Billion 58 Billion TBD TBD 13.3 Billion
GPU WGPs 48 42 30? 24? 20? 16
Stream Processors 6144 5376 3840? 3072? 2560? 2048
TMUs/ROPs 384 / 192 384 / 192 TBD TBD TBD 128 / 32
Game Clock 2.3 GHz 2.0 GHz TBD TBD TBD 2.2 GHz
Boost Clock 2.5 GHz 2.4 GHz TBD TBD TBD 2.6 GHz
FP32 TFLOPs 61 TFLOPs 52 TFLOPs TBD TBD TBD 22 TFLOPs
Memory Size 24 GB GDDR6 20 GB GDDR6 16 GB GDDR6? 12 GB GDDR6? 8 GB GDDR6? 8 GB GDDR6
Infinity Cache 96 MB 80 MB 60 MB? 48 MB? 40 MB? 32 MB
Memory Bus 384-bit 320-bit 256-bit 192-bit 128-bit 128-bit
Memory Clock 20 Gbps 20 Gbps 20 Gbps 20 Gbps 20 Gbps 18 Gbps
Bandwidth 960 GB/s 800 GB/s 640 GB/s 480 GB/s 320 GB/s 288 GB/s
Effective Bandwidth 3.5 TB/s 3.5 TB/s TBD TBD TBD 476.9 GB/s
TBP 355W 315W ~255W ~225W 175W 165W
PCIe Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
Price $999 US $899 US TBD TBD TBD $249-$299
Launch Dec, 2022 Dec, 2022 TBD TBD TBD May, 2023
Which upcoming 8 GB graphics card would you buy or recommend?
Vote to see results
Written by Hassan Mujtaba

Post a Comment

0 Comments